Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 614 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i9-10900 - $59.99 vs $275.98
- Up to 79% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-10900 - $0.24 vs $1.12 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 0% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G6900 - 246 vs 245 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 20 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
245
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16232 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
246
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
21%
Price, $
$275.98
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for $275.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16233 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |