Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770S on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770S is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3537 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770S.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770S
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $295.0 vs $432.99
- Up to 24% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-12900F - $1.27 vs $1.68 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-3770S - 257 vs 232 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770S - 24 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
232
90%
Value, $/FPS
$1.27/FPS
100%
Price, $
$295
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13920 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
257
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.68/FPS
75%
Price, $
$432.99
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for $432.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13920 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770S | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |