Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2550 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3770K - 187 vs 173 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - $120.0 vs $175.0
- Up to 37% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3770K - $0.64 vs $1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 65 vs 77 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
187
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.64/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3770K | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |