Buy on Amazon
$435
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i7-3720QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3902 days newer than Core i7-3720QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3720QM
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 26% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-3720QM - 216 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3720QM - 32 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
216
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.01/FPS
100%
Price, $
$435
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-13900F Desktop Processor 24 cores (8 P-cores + 16 E-cores) 36MB Cache, up to 5.6 GHz
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1405 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Core i7-3720QM
Mobile • Apr 29th, 2012
Core i9-13900F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3720QM | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 24 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
