Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms Core i7-3517U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1675 days newer than Core i7-3517U.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3517U
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930T - 17 vs 35 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield IV than Core i7-3517U - 375 vs 371 FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
375
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-3517U | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |