Buy on Amazon
$39
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms Core i7-2960XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1948 days newer than Core i7-2960XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2960XM
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 0% better in Minecraft than Core i7-2960XM - 611 vs 609 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i7-2960XM - 35 vs 55 Watts
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
611
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3930T Dual-core (2 Core) 2.7GHz Processor Socket H4 LGA-1151 OEM Pack-Tray Packaging Model CM8067703016211
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-2960XM
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2011
Celeron G3930T
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2960XM | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 55 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
