Buy on Amazon
$799.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $1096
Availability
MSRP in USD: $1096
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $4938
Availability
MSRP in USD: $4938
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Core i7-2920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 2122 days newer than Core i7-2920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2920XM
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 55 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 28% better in Starfield than Core i7-2920XM - 55 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2920XM - 44 vs 8 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
FPS
55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$14.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$799.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Xeon Processor E5-2699A v4 22 Core 2.40GHZ 55MB 145W CM8066003197800 (OEM Tray Processor)
Buy for $799.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-2920XM
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2920XM | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 22 |
| 8 | Threads | 44 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 145 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
