Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10940X outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10940X is 1089 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i9-10940X - 145 vs 165 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10940X - 44 vs 28 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10940X
- Performs up to 7% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 110 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 58% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $675.0 vs $1595.95
- Up to 60% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $6.14 vs $15.49 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
FPS
103
93.63636363636364%
Value, $/FPS
$15.49/FPS
39.638476436410585%
Price, $
$1595.95
42%
Buy for $1,595.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1831 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
110
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$675
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $675 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1835 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Single-Core
1175
75.22407170294494%
Multi-Core
9619
89.32119973999443%
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-10940X |
---|---|---|
Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Broadwell | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 14 |
44 | Threads | 28 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
145 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |