Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700 outperforms Core i7-2920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-8700 is 2555 days newer than Core i7-2920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2920XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-8700 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-8700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700
- Performs up to 19% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-2920XM - 177 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2920XM - 12 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
FPS
177
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$200
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $200 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6375 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2920XM | vs | Intel Core i7-8700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2018 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |