Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i7-2920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3405 days newer than Core i7-2920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2920XM
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 8% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i7-2920XM - 160 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2920XM - 16 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
160
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.41/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2872 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2920XM | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |