Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700X outperforms Core i7-2920XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700X is 2663 days newer than Core i7-2920XM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2920XM
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700X - 55 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Tanks than Core i7-2920XM - 528 vs 502 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2920XM - 16 vs 8 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
528
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$210
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3064 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2920XM | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |