Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Core i7-2675QM vs Core i9-10900F

Core i7-2675QM vs Core i9-10900F: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-10900F

2.8 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i9-10900F Logo
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W

Buy for $225 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 203 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

Intel Core i9-10900F

2.8 GHz | 10-core

Intel Core i9-10900F Logo
Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W

Buy for $225 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 203 minutes ago

Key Differences

In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i7-2675QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 3123 days newer than Core i7-2675QM.

Advantages of Intel Core i7-2675QM

  • Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 45 vs 65 Watts
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics

Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F

  • Performs up to 5% better in Metro Exodus than Core i7-2675QM - 146 vs 139 FPS
  • Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-2675QM - 20 vs 8 threads
This is a free version of Metro Exodus.
Metro Exodus

Metro Exodus

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Extreme

Intel Core i7-2675QM Logo
Core i7-2675QM

Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011


FPS

139

95%

Value, $/FPS

Price, $

Intel Core i9-10900F Logo
Core i9-10900F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


FPS

146

100%

Value, $/FPS

$1.54/FPS

100%

Price, $

$225

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Core i9-10900F Desktop Processor 10 Cores up to 5.2 GHz Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel 400 Series chipset) 65W

Buy for $225 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 203 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Extreme

Intel Core i7-2675QM Logo
Core i7-2675QM

Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011

Intel Core i9-10900F Logo
Core i9-10900F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Core i7-2675QM Logo
Core i7-2675QM

Mobile • Oct 12th, 2011


Single-Core

449

26%

Multi-Core

1385

16%

Intel Core i9-10900F Logo
Core i9-10900F

Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020


Single-Core

1676

100%

Multi-Core

8426

100%

Intel Core i7-2675QM Logo

Intel Core i7-2675QM

vs
Intel Core i9-10900F Logo

Intel Core i9-10900F

Oct 12th, 2011Release Date
Apr 30th, 2020
Core i7CollectionCore i9
Sandy BridgeCodenameComet Lake
Intel BGA 1224SocketIntel Socket 1200
Mobile
Segment
Desktop
4Cores
10
8Threads
20
2.2 GHzBase Clock Speed
2.8 GHz
3.1 GHzTurbo Clock Speed
5.2 GHz
45 W
TDP65 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
22.0xMultiplier
28.0x
Intel HD 3000
Integrated GraphicsNone
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.