Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms Core i7-2635QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 2192 days newer than Core i7-2635QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2635QM
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i3-7100 - 45 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 13% better in Lost Ark than Core i7-2635QM - 251 vs 223 FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
251
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 87 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-2635QM | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel BGA 1224 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |