Buy on Amazon
$59
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-2600K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-2600K is 694 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600K
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 22 than Celeron G1620 - 258 vs 250 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Up to 17% cheaper than Core i7-2600K - $49.0 vs $59.0
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600K - 55 vs 95 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Core i7-2600K Quad-Core Processor 3.4 Ghz 8 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I72600K
Buy for $59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1620 2.7 1 LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1620
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-2600K
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
61.227544910179645%
Multi-Core
723
31.163793103448278%
Intel Core i7-2600K | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
