Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700KF is 266 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700KF
- Performs up to 23% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G6900 - 135 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i7-13700KF - $59.99 vs $317.99
- Up to 77% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i7-13700KF - $0.55 vs $2.36 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.36/FPS
23%
Price, $
$317.99
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $317.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19142 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
110
81%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 19141 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700KF | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |