Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 1973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 240 vs 232 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 21% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $250.0 vs $316.71
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $316.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75781 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
232
96.66666666666667%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$250
100%
Buy for $250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75784 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
44.118752348741076%
Multi-Core
6976
45.07915993537964%
Intel Core i7-13700F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |