Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-14400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-14400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 369 days older than the cheaper Core i5-14400.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 0% better in Control than Core i5-14400 - 207 vs 206 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-14400 - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14400
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-13700F - $229.99 vs $1399.99
- Up to 83% better value when playing Control than Core i7-13700F - $1.12 vs $6.76 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-13700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
207
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.76/FPS
16%
Price, $
$1399.99
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12515 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
206
99%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$229.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $229.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12515 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-13700F | vs | Intel Core i5-14400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |