Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11375H outperforms Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-11375H is 256 days newer than Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11375H
- Performs up to 1% better in World of Tanks than Core i9-10900F - 548 vs 542 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-11375H - 20 vs 8 threads
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
542
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $225 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 26 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 11th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-11375H | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 11th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Iris XE 96EU | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |