Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 1430 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 5% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-6900K - 135 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - $120.0 vs $225.99
- Up to 44% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-10700F - $0.94 vs $1.67 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
135
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.67/FPS
56%
Price, $
$225.99
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13360 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
128
94%
Value, $/FPS
$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13360 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-10700F | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |