Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600 is 2331 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600
- Performs up to 37% better in Starfield than Celeron G550 - 59 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i5-9600 - $19.59 vs $125.0
- Up to 78% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-9600 - $0.46 vs $2.12 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
59
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.12/FPS
21.69811320754717%
Price, $
$125
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2455 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
43
72.88135593220339%
Value, $/FPS
$0.46/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2449 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Single-Core
385
26.333789329685363%
Multi-Core
629
12.722491909385115%
Intel Core i5-9600 | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |