Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 3210 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 70% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $49.0 vs $165.86
- Up to 63% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-11600KF - $0.3 vs $0.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 23% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G550 - 205 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 12 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9465 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
205
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
37%
Price, $
$165.86
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9465 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |