Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9600 outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9600 is 2187 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8350 - 159 vs 149 FPS
- Up to 1% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than FX-8350 - $1.23 vs $1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i5-9600 - $185.0 vs $195.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9600 - 8 vs 6 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
159
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$195
94%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $195 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4112 minutes ago
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-9600 | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |