Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400 is 3064 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400
- Performs up to 13% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-875K - 131 vs 116 FPS
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i7-875K - $126.93 vs $174.02
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-875K - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-875K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400 - 8 vs 6 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $126.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
Buy for $174.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
509
36.77745664739884%
Multi-Core
1761
36.72575599582899%
Intel Core i5-9400 | vs | Intel Core i7-875K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | May 30th, 2010 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |