Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-8400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-8400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1079 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-8400T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8400T
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $139.0 vs $189.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-11600K - $1.29 vs $1.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 16% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i5-8400T - 125 vs 108 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-8400T - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8400T doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
FPS
108
86.4%
Value, $/FPS
$1.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$139
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5618 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
125
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.51/FPS
85.43046357615894%
Price, $
$189
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for $189 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5621 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Single-Core
1099
50.27447392497712%
Multi-Core
3884
45.273341881338155%
Intel Core i5-8400T | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |