Key Differences
In short — Core i5-760 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-760 is 413 days older than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Performs up to 1% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G540 - 90 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i5-760 - $19.25 vs $100.0
- Up to 80% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-760 - $0.22 vs $1.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i5-760 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-760 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3688 minutes ago
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3687 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Lynnfield | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |