Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 2188 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 82% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $19.25 vs $109.99
- Up to 81% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - $0.17 vs $0.91 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 4% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Celeron G540 - 121 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 16 vs 2 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
116
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 120 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
18%
Price, $
$109.99
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $109.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |