Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-760 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-760 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2580 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-760.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-760
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $100.0 vs $488.38
- Up to 81% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.6 vs $3.19 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 8% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-760 - 181 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-760 - 32 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.19/FPS
18%
Price, $
$488.38
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $488.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 18th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-760 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jul 18th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Lynnfield | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |