Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7400 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7400 is 1583 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7400
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i3-3220 - 150 vs 145 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Up to 23% cheaper than Core i5-7400 - $91.98 vs $119.0
- Up to 20% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-7400 - $0.63 vs $0.79 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-7400 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.79/FPS
79.74683544303797%
Price, $
$119
77%
FPS Winner
Buy for $119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3815 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
145
96.66666666666667%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$91.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $91.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3811 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
525
44.642857142857146%
Multi-Core
1085
33.570544554455445%
Intel Core i5-7400 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |