Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-6600T outperforms the cheaper FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-6600T is 982 days newer than the cheaper FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Performs up to 83% better in Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than FX-8300 - 88 vs 48 FPS
- Up to 12% better value when playing Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart than FX-8300 - $2.04 vs $2.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Up to 38% cheaper than Core i5-6600T - $112.02 vs $179.95
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600T - 8 vs 4 threads
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Apart
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
88
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.04/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.95
62%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $179.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15056 minutes ago
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15056 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |