Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-9400F outperforms the more expensive Core i5-6600T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1286 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-6600T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-6600T - 187 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 47% cheaper than Core i5-6600T - $96.0 vs $179.95
- Up to 48% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i5-6600T - $0.51 vs $0.98 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600T - 6 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $179.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15166 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
187
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-6600T | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jul 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |