Key Differences
In short — Core i5-5675R outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-5675R is 249 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5675R
- Performs up to 4% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 129 vs 124 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5675R - 12 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-5675R
Desktop • May 15th, 2015
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-5675R | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
May 15th, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Broadwell | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel BGA 1364 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics 6200 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
