Key Differences
In short — Core i5-5200U outperforms FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-5200U is 859 days newer than FX-8320.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-5200U
- Performs up to 5% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-8320 - 103 vs 98 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8320
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-5200U - 8 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $203 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 101 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-5200U | vs | AMD FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 5500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |