Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690S outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4690S is 514 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690S
- Performs up to 8% better in No Man's Sky than Celeron G1610 - 169 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i5-4690S - $37.0 vs $140.78
- Up to 71% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-4690S - $0.24 vs $0.83 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690S - 55 vs 65 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $140.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4690S | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |