Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $99
Availability
MSRP in USD: $99
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 2200G outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 2200G is 1897 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 66% cheaper than Ryzen 3 2200G - $37.0 vs $110.0
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 2200G - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 2200G
- Performs up to 30% better in F1 23 than Celeron G1610 - 189 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65337 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Processor with Radeon Vega 8 Graphics - YD2200C5FBBOX
Buy for $110 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65339 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Ryzen 3 2200G
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
42.72818455366098%
Multi-Core
739
25.857242827151854%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 2200G |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raven Ridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
