Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4690K outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4690K is 49 days older than the more expensive Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i3-4160 - 233 vs 230 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i3-4160 - $54.0 vs $254.12
- Up to 79% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i3-4160 - $0.23 vs $1.1 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Consumes up to 39% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690K - 54 vs 88 Watts
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
233
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2508 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
230
98.71244635193133%
Value, $/FPS
$1.1/FPS
20.909090909090907%
Price, $
$254.12
21%
Buy for $254.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2508 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
82.67288267288268%
Multi-Core
2072
57.0641696502341%
Intel Core i5-4690K | vs | Intel Core i3-4160 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
88 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |