Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-4160 is 1656 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-540 - 199 vs 190 FPS
- Consumes up to 26% less energy than Intel Core i3-540 - 54 vs 73 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i3-4160 - $60.0 vs $254.12
- Up to 75% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i3-4160 - $0.32 vs $1.28 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $254.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1659 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
FPS
190
95.47738693467338%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$60
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1655 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Core i3-540 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 73 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |