Buy on Amazon
$11.48
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4160 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4160 is 595 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Celeron G1620 - 149 vs 144 FPS
- Up to 77% cheaper than Celeron G1620 - $11.48 vs $49.0
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 54 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 4 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core I3-4160 Processor 3.60 GHz, 2-Core LGA1150 Socket, Hyper-Threading (BX80646I34160)
Buy for $11.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 132 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1620 2.7 1 LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1620
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4160
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
38.43984962406015%
Multi-Core
723
34.89382239382239%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.