Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 2330 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - $70.0 vs $579.99
- Up to 87% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900X - $0.55 vs $4.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 84 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-4670 - 134 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 20 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7222 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.33/FPS
12%
Price, $
$579.99
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for $579.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Haswell | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |