Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4670 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4670 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 3503 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4670.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - $60.0 vs $419.95
- Up to 62% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i9-13900F - $0.8 vs $2.12 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 13% better in Deathloop than Core i5-4670 - 198 vs 175 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670 - 32 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
FPS
175
88.38383838383838%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$60
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 27 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
198
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.12/FPS
37.735849056603776%
Price, $
$419.95
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for $419.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Single-Core
1172
42.93040293040293%
Multi-Core
3228
18.746733259771183%
Intel Core i5-4670 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
84 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |