Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-4460T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-4460T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1258 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-4460T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460T
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $52.87 vs $270.0
- Up to 80% better value when playing Death Stranding than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $0.24 vs $1.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Death Stranding than Core i5-4460T - 222 vs 217 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460T - 24 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
FPS
217
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$52.87
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $52.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5157 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
222
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.22/FPS
19%
Price, $
$270
19%
FPS Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5158 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4460T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |