Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i5-4300M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1439 days newer than Core i5-4300M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4300M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 37 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Core i5-4300M - 150 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4300M - 24 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
150
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.8/FPS
100%
Price, $
$270
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $270 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14012 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4300M | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 5000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |