Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10105F outperforms Core i5-4288U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2842 days newer than Core i5-4288U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4288U
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i3-10105F - 28 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i5-4288U - 234 vs 228 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4288U - 8 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
234
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14460 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4288U | vs | Intel Core i3-10105F |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 5100 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |