Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3803 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $95.0 vs $461.15
- Up to 77% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-13900K - $0.41 vs $1.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 14% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-3450 - 263 vs 231 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
263
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.75/FPS
23%
Price, $
$461.15
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $461.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |