Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3450 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 3537 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3450
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i9-12900F - $95.0 vs $411.33
- Up to 74% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i9-12900F - $0.41 vs $1.6 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i5-3450 - 257 vs 231 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 24 vs 4 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10811 minutes ago
Buy for $411.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10821 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |