Buy on Amazon
$95
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $174
Availability
MSRP in USD: $174
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10300 outperforms the more expensive Core i5-3450 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10300 is 2923 days newer than the more expensive Core i5-3450.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Performs up to 15% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3450 - 134 vs 117 FPS
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i5-3450 - $90.0 vs $95.0
- Up to 17% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-3450 - $0.67 vs $0.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-3450 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3450 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-3450
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
117
87.31343283582089%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
82.71604938271605%
Price, $
$95
94%
Intel Core i5-3450 Quad-Core Processor 3.1 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80637I53450
Buy for $95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58285 minutes ago
Core i3-10300
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$90
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i3-10300 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.4 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W
Buy for $90 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58285 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i5-3450
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Core i3-10300
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3450
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Single-Core
603
38.53035143769968%
Multi-Core
1781
37.142857142857146%
Intel Core i5-3450 | vs | Intel Core i3-10300 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 77 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 31.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
