Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core i5-3437U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1682 days newer than Core i5-3437U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3437U
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 17 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 13% better in Battlefield V than Core i5-3437U - 234 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3437U - 24 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
234
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$235
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $235 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8139 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3437U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |