Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms Core i5-3317U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1677 days newer than Core i5-3317U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3317U
- Consumes up to 51% less energy than Intel Celeron G3930T - 17 vs 35 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 4% better in Rust than Core i5-3317U - 158 vs 152 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
158
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3237 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3317U | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
17 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |