Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Core i5-3210M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 829 days newer than Core i5-3210M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3210M
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 35 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i5-3210M - 154 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3210M - 12 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Core i5-3210M
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-3210M | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
