Key Differences
In short — Core i5-2500 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-2500 is 2186 days older than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2500
- Performs up to 0% better in F1 22 than Celeron G3930T - 256 vs 255 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i5-2500 - $39.0 vs $194.3
- Up to 80% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i5-2500 - $0.15 vs $0.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-2500 - 35 vs 95 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $194.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2500 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |