Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Core i5-2430M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4113 days newer than Core i5-2430M.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2430M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 23% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-2430M - 190 vs 154 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2430M - 32 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$435
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $435 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7735 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Mobile • Oct 1st, 2011
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2430M | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Oct 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |